Personalized Glitter Graphics

Christian Glitter by www.christianglitter.com
MY REALLY REAL FAMILY OF CHRIST!!!!!!!
http://www.GraffitiGen.com/ - Graffiti - Graffiti Creator - MySpace Layouts - online casino http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=189212346&MyToken=ae7e3f44-d1b7-4c6d-87d8-3ad122d7fc77
http://www.GraffitiGen.com/ - Graffiti - Graffiti Creator - MySpace Layouts - online casino http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=192112520

.. - Get Your Own

http://www.GraffitiGen.com/ - Graffiti - Graffiti Creator - MySpace Layouts - Online Psychic Reading Classic (Better Than I've Ever Been) - DJ Premier Remix

Add to My Profile | More Videos

FATHERS Our Father in Heaven Is loving and kind Our fathers on earth Should be of like mind Our Father in Heaven Corrects in love Our fathers on earth Follow His lead from above Our Father in Heaven Wants fathers below To raise up their children In the way they should go So that as they grow older And try to wander away Our Father in Heaven Can bring them home to stay Our Father in Heaven Has placed here below Fathers on earth To help His children grow. Kathryn Kenney Username: myfatheristheking Written: 06-14-96

height="350"

So what exactly does Culture Jam for Life stand for? There has been some confusion for some because we often stand up for more left wing causes such as environmentalism and worker's rights, but stand up for the unborn and newborns, which is a more socially conservative cause. Here is an official policy manifesto of sorts, which we believe are based on common sense and what a majority of the American public agrees with. It is based on a value towards life. 1. Abortion is a euphemism for, scientifically, the killing of a human life, the stopping of a beating heart, the sickening and tragic murder of an innocent life. It involves poisoning and dismembering of a baby. Just because someone is not responsible enough to use condoms or other pre-conception contraception does not make it okay to just kill the new life that has resulted. Abortion on demand has led to abortion as a form of birth control. 2. Just because many people that are against abortion favor various wars does not make abortion any more permissible. Many people complain, "Well what about war or the death penalty?" This is just a way to change the subject. Besides, there are plenty of people that oppose both abortion and the Vietnam War, for example. There are some who support just wars while other subscribe to a more pacifist view. One could also say that people that are concerned about dead civilians from the Iraq War are often hypocritical when they pine for the likes of partial birth abortion. Even though they have a good point about dead civilians, and how we should avoid killing civilians of course, it doesn't make abortion any better, another form of killing. 3. Abortion should only be permitted when the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, or if the pregnancy results from rape of incest. The choice should lie with who to have sex with. If a woman or girl is raped, then it was not her choice to have sex in the first place and she should have the option of getting cleaned out after the rape. Yes, there is a chance that may result in the flushing out of a very early life, but the woman or girl's right to be cleaned out after a rape and to take the morning after pill outweighs any right the tiny life does to implant into the uterine wall. She should immediately report it to the police for evidence so that the rapist can be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Of course, if some leftists allowed us to keep violent rapists and murderers alike in jail for the rest of their lives, then we wouldn't have to worry about that as much. As for when the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, we might as well save the mother's life since both would die if the mother dies while the child is in utero. But having an exception for the "health" of the mother is inappropriate since this can be abused and has led to abortion on demand in various countries where the health clause is brought up for various reasons, from "mental health" and other made-up reasons to kill an unborn child. Besides, any pregnancy can pose a threat to the health of the mother, and so can an abortion. Abortions from rape, incest or to save the life of the mother represent less than one percent of abortions; sadly, most are a form of birth control. 4. Pre-conception contraception should be available to consenting adults. Conception that prevents conception, such as condoms, do not destroy a new life or a human being, but instead prevent conception. Conception is when life starts--it is scientifically proven. There is some "contraception," such as the abortion pill RU-486 or the morning after pill, that actually commits (or may commit in the case of the morning after) an abortion of a very early life. Except in cases of rape or incest, this should not be permitted, since it is the killing of an innocent human life for convenience. We respect the official Catholic view that all contraception is wrong; but this is a religious view, not one that can be defened on secular or non-Catholic grounds. While some argue that banning abortion as a form of birth control is pushing a religion onto someone else, it's not. Objections to the killing of innocent human life--as well as objections to slavery, infanticide and murder--can be argued on both religious and secular grounds. The state has an interest in protecting innocent human life: in fact, it should be one of the foremost functions of the state. But the state has no business in taking away condoms from consenting adults. Sex is not just for procreation, althought a child may result from sex of course and the no one is an accident. The author of Song of Solomon is not talking about reproduction when he beautifully describes the love between a man and his wife. Banning all contraception--including pre-conception contraception such as condoms--would lead not only to over-population but also to more people being infected with diseases. 5. Children should not be taught to have sex. Sex is a beautiful thing that, according to Christianity and many other religions, should be enjoyed to the fullest extent between a husband and wife, within the context of marriage. Since many people are not Christians, they often engage in premarital or extramarital sex, and that is their choice. But there seems to be a worldwide agenda of organizations such as Planned Parenthood to encourage children to have sex. Children should be allowed to enjoy their childhood without perverted organizations such as Planned Parenthood that try to push sex as a recreational activity, devoid of any responsibility or awareness of the possible consequences. If people are not ready to have a child, they should not have irresponsible sex; therefore, children should not have sex, since they are children. This is really common sense. Of course, when the adults themselves pushing the pro-irresponsible and random sex with various partners are not responsible themselves, how are the children they teach going to be responsible? Pro-abortion organizations and pundits complain about abstinence-only education, but that truly is the only way for children to avoid STD's or unwanted pregnancies. While some make bad decisions, and some consenting high school juniors, seniors may want to engage in sex, they should be taught to use condoms, but they should also be taught that if they are not ready for a child then avoid it until they are ready, since condoms may slip. 6. Finally, with the exception of pregnancies resulting from rape or incest or those that threaten the life of the mother, abortion should be made illegal. The state has an interest in protecting the life of the innocent, especially the most innocent of human beings, the child. Hopefully one day the courts will not legislate from the bench, but instead realize the phantom right to kill an unborn child is not a right in the constitution but instead something pushed forward by moral relativists, eugenic bigots and an evil ideology that has resulted in the murder of millions. So what exactly does Culture Jam for Life stand for? There has been some confusion for some because we often stand up for more left wing causes such as environmentalism and worker's rights, but stand up for the unborn and newborns, which is a more socially conservative cause. Here is an official policy manifesto of sorts, which we believe are based on common sense and what a majority of the American public agrees with. It is based on a value towards life. 1. Abortion is a euphemism for, scientifically, the killing of a human life, the stopping of a beating heart, the sickening and tragic murder of an innocent life. It involves poisoning and dismembering of a baby. Just because someone is not responsible enough to use condoms or other pre-conception contraception does not make it okay to just kill the new life that has resulted. Abortion on demand has led to abortion as a form of birth control. 2. Just because many people that are against abortion favor various wars does not make abortion any more permissible. Many people complain, "Well what about war or the death penalty?" This is just a way to change the subject. Besides, there are plenty of people that oppose both abortion and the Vietnam War, for example. There are some who support just wars while other subscribe to a more pacifist view. One could also say that people that are concerned about dead civilians from the Iraq War are often hypocritical when they pine for the likes of partial birth abortion. Even though they have a good point about dead civilians, and how we should avoid killing civilians of course, it doesn't make abortion any better, another form of killing. 3. Abortion should only be permitted when the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, or if the pregnancy results from rape of incest. The choice should lie with who to have sex with. If a woman or girl is raped, then it was not her choice to have sex in the first place and she should have the option of getting cleaned out after the rape. Yes, there is a chance that may result in the flushing out of a very early life, but the woman or girl's right to be cleaned out after a rape and to take the morning after pill outweighs any right the tiny life does to implant into the uterine wall. She should immediately report it to the police for evidence so that the rapist can be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Of course, if some leftists allowed us to keep violent rapists and murderers alike in jail for the rest of their lives, then we wouldn't have to worry about that as much. As for when the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, we might as well save the mother's life since both would die if the mother dies while the child is in utero. But having an exception for the "health" of the mother is inappropriate since this can be abused and has led to abortion on demand in various countries where the health clause is brought up for various reasons, from "mental health" and other made-up reasons to kill an unborn child. Besides, any pregnancy can pose a threat to the health of the mother, and so can an abortion. Abortions from rape, incest or to save the life of the mother represent less than one percent of abortions; sadly, most are a form of birth control. 4. Pre-conception contraception should be available to consenting adults. Conception that prevents conception, such as condoms, do not destroy a new life or a human being, but instead prevent conception. Conception is when life starts--it is scientifically proven. There is some "contraception," such as the abortion pill RU-486 or the morning after pill, that actually commits (or may commit in the case of the morning after) an abortion of a very early life. Except in cases of rape or incest, this should not be permitted, since it is the killing of an innocent human life for convenience. We respect the official Catholic view that all contraception is wrong; but this is a religious view, not one that can be defened on secular or non-Catholic grounds. While some argue that banning abortion as a form of birth control is pushing a religion onto someone else, it's not. Objections to the killing of innocent human life--as well as objections to slavery, infanticide and murder--can be argued on both religious and secular grounds. The state has an interest in protecting innocent human life: in fact, it should be one of the foremost functions of the state. But the state has no business in taking away condoms from consenting adults. Sex is not just for procreation, althought a child may result from sex of course and the no one is an accident. The author of Song of Solomon is not talking about reproduction when he beautifully describes the love between a man and his wife. Banning all contraception--including pre-conception contraception such as condoms--would lead not only to over-population but also to more people being infected with diseases. 5. Children should not be taught to have sex. Sex is a beautiful thing that, according to Christianity and many other religions, should be enjoyed to the fullest extent between a husband and wife, within the context of marriage. Since many people are not Christians, they often engage in premarital or extramarital sex, and that is their choice. But there seems to be a worldwide agenda of organizations such as Planned Parenthood to encourage children to have sex. Children should be allowed to enjoy their childhood without perverted organizations such as Planned Parenthood that try to push sex as a recreational activity, devoid of any responsibility or awareness of the possible consequences. If people are not ready to have a child, they should not have irresponsible sex; therefore, children should not have sex, since they are children. This is really common sense. Of course, when the adults themselves pushing the pro-irresponsible and random sex with various partners are not responsible themselves, how are the children they teach going to be responsible? Pro-abortion organizations and pundits complain about abstinence-only education, but that truly is the only way for children to avoid STD's or unwanted pregnancies. While some make bad decisions, and some consenting high school juniors, seniors may want to engage in sex, they should be taught to use condoms, but they should also be taught that if they are not ready for a child then avoid it until they are ready, since condoms may slip. 6. Finally, with the exception of pregnancies resulting from rape or incest or those that threaten the life of the mother, abortion should be made illegal. The state has an interest in protecting the life of the innocent, especially the most innocent of human beings, the child. Hopefully one day the courts will not legislate from the bench, but instead realize the phantom right to kill an unborn child is not a right in the constitution but instead something pushed forward by moral relativists, eugenic bigots and an evil ideology that has resulted in the murder of millions.

Is Benny Hinn a False Prophet? http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/tbn.htm Jesus warned us that “false Christs and false prophets” will come and will attempt to deceive even God’s elect (Matthew 24:23-27; see also 2 Peter 3:3 and Jude 17-18). To best guard yourself against falsehood and false teachers - know the truth. To spot a counterfeit, study the real thing. Any believer who is, “rightly dividing the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15), and who makes a careful study of the Bible, can identify false doctrine. Peter popoff For example, a believer who has read the activities of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in Matthew 3:16-17 will immediately question any doctrine that denies the Trinity. Therefore, “step one” is to study the Bible and judge all teaching by what the scripture says. Peter Popoff Exposed on Inside Edition Jesus said “a tree is known by his fruit” (Matthew 12:33). When looking for “fruit,” here are three specific tests to apply to any teacher to determine the accuracy of his or her teaching: 1) What does this teacher say about Jesus? In Matthew 16:15, Jesus asks, “Whom say ye that I am?” Peter answers, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,” and for this answer Peter is called “blessed.” In 2 John 9, we read, “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.” In other words, Jesus Christ and His work of redemption is of utmost importance; beware anyone who denies that Jesus is equal with God, who downplays Jesus’ substitutionary death, or who rejects Jesus’ humanity. First John 2:22 says, “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.” 2) Does this teacher preach the gospel? The gospel is defined as the good news concerning Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection, according to the scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:1-4). As nice as they sound, the statements “God loves you,” “God wants us to feed the hungry,” and “God wants you to be wealthy” are NOT the complete message of the gospel. As Paul warns in Galatians 1:7, “There be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.” No one, not even a great preacher, has the right to change the message that God gave us. “If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:9). 3) Does this teacher exhibit character qualities that glorify the Lord? Speaking of false teachers, Jude 11 says, “They have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Korah.” In other words, a false teacher can be known by his pride (Cain’s rejection of God’s plan), greed (Balaam’s prophesying for money), and rebellion (Korah’s promotion of himself over Moses). For further study, review those books of the Bible that were written specifically to combat false teaching within the church: Galatians, 2 Peter, 2 John, and Jude. It is often difficult to spot a false teacher / false prophet. That is what a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” is all about. Satan and his demons masquerade as “angels of light” (2 Corinthians 11:14), and his ministers masquerade as servants of righteousness (2 Corinthians 11:15). Only by being thoroughly familiar with the truth will we be able to recognize a counterfeit. -Gotquestions.org Repost this if you like... Spread the word!!! Hit reply for code..